добавлю к прочему
весьма показательная цитата
As a professional web manager and a regular user of stock photography from Fotolia and Stockxpert, I was intrigued by an email from stockxpert promoting subscriptions to photos.com, so I came across to take a look.
I gave up looking after browsing just 4-5 pages of thumbnails.
First, the photos are crappy (not all of them, but enough to make it a problem) - models with pained expressions on their faces; poor lighting; low contrast; parts of bodies cropped out; etc.
Second, the search is crappy. I have to browse 255,000 photos because I can't narrow my search beyond keyword, category and image style.
Frankly, I would not waste my time here. The photos at Stockxpert and Fotolia, even though mostly taken by amateurs, are better and more accessible
ссылка на страницу с ней
http://www.stockxpert.com/forum.phtm...c&n=15291&p=10
ради интереса я решил проверить и также зашел на photos.com
чувак оказался абсолютно прав O_O