Отреджектили картинку с формулировкой про бандинг. При этом дописали еще целую кучу косяков. С бандингом согласен, не доглядел. Но как быть с остальным?
Еще, повторно перезалить не разрешили, после исправления косяков.
Если исправить бандинг и перезалить (картинка в деталях немного по другому будет выглядеть), не будет ли инспектор ругаться?
Отказ:
++ visible banding/posterization
This image appears to be over-filtered/over-processed which has affected the image quality. This may include Photoshop filters & effects (over-sharpening, excessive adjustments to levels, curves, contrast, hues, gaussian blurs, saturation, added textures, noise reduction...) or other manipulations. We feel the image would have more value to designers with minimal or no post processing effects so that the designers could add their own post-processing effects. Some images can benefit from minor touch-ups to grab the viewer?s attention and there is no definitive line to what editing makes or breaks a great image but the end result should be a single image that can still be molded into a design. Inspectors judge images based on quality, composition and usability. If you require further explanation regarding this rejection, please submit a ticket to Scout (
http://www.istockphoto.com/contact_ticket.php)
For more information about iStock Standards, please visit:
http://www.istockphoto.com/tutorial_1.0_account.php
We found the overall composition of this file's lighting could be improved. Some of the technical aspects that can all limit the usefulness of a file are:
-Flat/dull colors
-Direct on-camera flash and/or flash fall-off (bright subject, dark background)
-Harsh lighting with blown-out highlights that lack details and/or distracting shadows
- Distracting lens flares
-Incorrect white balance
For information about iStock lighting standards please see:
http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=524
For more information on iStock Lighting Standards, please see:
http://www.istockphoto.com/tutorial_2.2_lighting.php
Related Articles:
Lighting and Shadows:
http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=46
Setting up your own home studio:
http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=14
Custom White Balance:
http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=95
Decent Exposure:
http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=40
If you require further explanation regarding this rejection, please visit our critique forum for immediate peer to peer feedback. To visit the critique forum please see:
http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_threads.php?forumid=26
We found this image to be out of focus viewed at 100%. Some potential issues that may have caused us to reject your image:
? The subject of the photo is out of focus.
? The image is too busy and has no distinct subject to grab viewers attention.
? The photo is blurred from camera shake or subject movement. If this is an intentional blur, it should at a minimum have a point of focus, which demonstrates detail.
? The depth of field is too shallow, leaving too much of the subject out of focus.
? Texture image with focus fall-off to one side or in the corners. Texture shots should generally be in sharp focus across the entire image.
If you require further explanation regarding this rejection, please submit a ticket to Scout (
http://www.istockphoto.com/contact_ticket.php)
For more information about iStock Focus Standards, please see:
http://www.istockphoto.com/tutorial_2.1_focus.php
If you need more information please visit the pages (if any) listed next to the above issue(s).
If you require further explanation regarding this rejection, please contact Scout via Support link:
http://www.istockphoto.com/contact_ticket.php.
The iStockphoto forums may also contain valuable educational information, however, forum posts regarding specific declined files will be removed at the discretion of the administrator.
Thank you for your continued interest in iStockphoto.com
Re: Обсуждаем инспекторские отказы на IS
.
